Xeon Gold 6438N vs Platinum 8280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8280
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
20.64
Xeon Gold 6438N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
33.23
+61%

Xeon Gold 6438N outperforms Xeon Platinum 8280 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking264117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6625.69
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.5315.34
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6438N has 1448% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8280.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8280 20.64
Xeon Gold 6438N 33.23
+61%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
Xeon Gold 6438N 52789
+61%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.64 33.23
Recency 11 December 2018 10 January 2023
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64

Xeon Gold 6438N has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6438N is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6438N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon Gold 6438N
Xeon Gold 6438N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6438N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Xeon Gold 6438N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.