EPYC 9475F vs Xeon Platinum 8280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking269not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.48no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Turin (2024)
Release date11 December 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads5696
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 28 48
Threads 56 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8280 has 95.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.