Apple M1 vs Xeon Platinum 8268

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8268
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.71
+320%

Xeon Platinum 8268 outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2401192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency10.02no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)no data
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,302no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8268 21.71
+320%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8268 34483
+320%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.71 5.17
Recency 11 December 2018 10 November 2020
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon Platinum 8268 has a 319.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8268 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8268 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 58 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8268 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2233 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8268 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.