Xeon Gold 6212U vs Platinum 8260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
19.62
+10.5%
Xeon Gold 6212U
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
17.76

Platinum 8260 outperforms Gold 6212U by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking274331
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.1214.40
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,702$2,000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6212U has 181% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8260.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L2 cache24 MB24 MB
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)35.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket3647Socket P
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TiB1 TiB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U.

PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260 19.62
+10.5%
Xeon Gold 6212U 17.76

Platinum 8260 outperforms Gold 6212U by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8260 30347
+10.5%
Xeon Gold 6212U 27470

Platinum 8260 outperforms Gold 6212U by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.62 17.76

Xeon Platinum 8260 has a 10.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6212U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Gold 6212U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260
Intel Xeon Gold 6212U
Xeon Gold 6212U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 51 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6212U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260 or Xeon Gold 6212U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.