Iris Graphics 48 vs Xeon Platinum 8256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking730not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Iris Graphics
Power efficiency9.53no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Gen9
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.3 GHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8256 is a server/workstation processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8256 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
Xeon Platinum 8256
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8256 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.