3015e vs Xeon Platinum 8180M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8180M
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
32.38
+1794%

Xeon Platinum 8180M outperforms 3015e by a whopping 1794% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1242040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency14.9526.97
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$13,011no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads564
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB192 KB
L2 cache28 MB1 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C105 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FT5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8180M 32.38
+1794%
3015e 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8180M 51439
+1797%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.38 1.71
Recency 25 April 2017 4 August 2020
Physical cores 28 2
Threads 56 4
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8180M has a 1793.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 3316.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8180M is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8180M is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8180M and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M
Xeon Platinum 8180M
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8180M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8180M or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.