Xeon Platinum 8270 vs Platinum 8180

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8180
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
24.09
+27.6%
Xeon Platinum 8270
2018
26 cores / 52 threads, 205 Watt
18.88

Xeon Platinum 8180 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8270 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.943.75
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency11.128.72
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)11 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$7,405

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8270 has 93% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8180.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)26 (Hexacosa-Core)
Threads5652
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2527
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)35.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C84 °C
Number of transistors8,000 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8180 24.09
+27.6%
Xeon Platinum 8270 18.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8180 38259
+27.6%
Xeon Platinum 8270 29986

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.09 18.88
Recency 11 July 2017 11 December 2018
Physical cores 28 26
Threads 56 52

Xeon Platinum 8180 has a 27.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 7.7% more physical cores and 7.7% more threads.

Xeon Platinum 8270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Platinum 8270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
Xeon Platinum 8180
Intel Xeon Platinum 8270
Xeon Platinum 8270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 14 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8180 or Xeon Platinum 8270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.