Celeron 450 vs Xeon Platinum 8176

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking487not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.27no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency8.37no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,719no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads561
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB
L2 cache28 MB512 KB
L3 cache38.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °C60 °C
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8176 23179
+5341%
Celeron 450 426

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 28 1
Threads 56 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8176 has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 450, on the other hand, has 371.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8176 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8176 and Celeron 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
Xeon Platinum 8176
Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8176 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 44 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8176 or Celeron 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.