Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
16.85
+103%
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.32

Xeon Platinum 8175M outperforms Ryzen 5 3500X by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking385905
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data12.06
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads486
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB384 KB
L2 cache24 MB3 MB
L3 cache33 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket PAM4
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 16.85
+103%
Ryzen 5 3500X 8.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+103%
Ryzen 5 3500X 13161

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.85 8.32
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Xeon Platinum 8175M has a 102.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3500X, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8175M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Ryzen 5 3500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1795 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Ryzen 5 3500X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.