Xeon W-3275 vs Platinum 8173M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
17.64
Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.77
+46.1%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8173M by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking347190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data11.90
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads5656
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2125
L1 cache1.75 MB1.75 MB
L2 cache28 MB28 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket PFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)no data205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1,536 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 17.64
Xeon W-3275 25.77
+46.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
Xeon W-3275 40931
+46.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.64 25.77

Xeon W-3275 has a 46.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8173M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.