MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Xeon Platinum 8173M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 347 | 1923 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.09 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.75 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 38.5 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 2000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.64 | 1.99 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 8 |
| Threads | 56 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8173M has a 786.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.
MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8173M is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8173M is a server/workstation processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
