EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8173M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
18.35
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.60
+39.5%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8173M by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking340197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data15.03
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateno data15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2130
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP3
Power consumption (TDP)no data155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 18.35
EPYC 7313 25.60
+39.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
EPYC 7313 39091
+39.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.35 25.60
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Xeon Platinum 8173M has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 39.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8173M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.