Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon Platinum 8168

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8168
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.63
+30.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.63

Xeon Platinum 8168 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking260412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.749.13
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency9.628.42
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)6 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,890$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 144% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8168.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2735
L1 cache1.5 MB1.125 MB
L2 cache24 MB6 MB
L3 cache33 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8168 21.63
+30.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8168 33099
+30%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25454

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Platinum 8168 1197
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1278
+6.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Platinum 8168 10829
+47.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7364

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.63 16.63
Recency 25 April 2017 6 August 2018
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8168 has a 30.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 13.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8168 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Xeon Platinum 8168
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8168 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8168 or Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.