Phenom X4 9100e vs Xeon Platinum 8168

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8168
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
20.91
+2481%
Phenom X4 9100e
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
0.81

Xeon Platinum 8168 outperforms Phenom X4 9100e by a whopping 2481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2622592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.611.17
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,890no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8168 20.91
+2481%
Phenom X4 9100e 0.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8168 33099
+2488%
Phenom X4 9100e 1279

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.91 0.81
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8168 has a 2481.5% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom X4 9100e, on the other hand, has 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X4 9100e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8168 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom X4 9100e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8168 and Phenom X4 9100e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Xeon Platinum 8168
AMD Phenom X4 9100e
Phenom X4 9100e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8168 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 20 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9100e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8168 or Phenom X4 9100e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.