Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon Platinum 8168

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8168
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
20.91
+38.1%
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.14

Xeon Platinum 8168 outperforms Core Ultra 7 268V by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking262462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.6183.93
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,890no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes484

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.91 15.14
Recency 25 April 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8168 has a 38.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1105.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 268V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8168 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8168 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
Xeon Platinum 8168
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8168 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8168 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.