Xeon W-3375 vs Platinum 8160M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
34.59
Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
38.45
+11.2%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8160M by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.13no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency21.1113.04
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)38
Threads4876
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 34.59
Xeon W-3375 38.45
+11.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
Xeon W-3375 59091
+11.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.59 38.45
Recency 25 April 2017 29 July 2021
Physical cores 24 38
Threads 48 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has 80% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 58.3% more physical cores and 58.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8160M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.