Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Platinum 8160M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
34.10
+19.7%
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
28.49

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352M by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking116167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.16no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency21.1114.30
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 34.10
+19.7%
Xeon Platinum 8352M 28.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+19.7%
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.10 28.49
Recency 25 April 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 23.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8352M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8352M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.