Ryzen Threadripper 5990X vs Xeon Platinum 8160M
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 115 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.12 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | 21.12 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Chagall |
| Release date | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,704 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.45 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | TRX4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 1.5 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 64 |
| Threads | 48 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8160M has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 5990X, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 5990X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Ryzen Threadripper 5990X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
