i5-10600KF vs Xeon Platinum 8160M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
34.74
+274%

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core i5-10600KF by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking115853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.12no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency21.128.93
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 34.74
+274%
i5-10600KF 9.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+274%
i5-10600KF 14225

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.74 9.30
Recency 25 April 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 12
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has a 273.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-10600KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-10600KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i5-10600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Core i5-10600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 906 votes

Rate Core i5-10600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Core i5-10600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.