Ryzen 7 7840U vs Xeon Platinum 8153

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8153
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
21.03
+28.9%

Xeon Platinum 8153 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840U by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking272426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.70no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency15.3453.15
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,115no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP8
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-5600
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8153 21.03
+28.9%
Ryzen 7 7840U 16.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8153 32180
+28.8%
Ryzen 7 7840U 24979

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.03 16.32
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8153 has a 28.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7840U, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8153 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8153
Xeon Platinum 8153
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8153 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 233 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8153 or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.