Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Xeon Phi 7285
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Knights Mill (2017) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) |
| Release date | 1 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 272 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
| PCI Express lanes | 36 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2017 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 68 | 12 |
| Threads | 272 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7285 has 466.7% more physical cores and 1033.3% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 354.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7285 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7285 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
