Duron 750 vs Xeon Phi 7285
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Duron |
| Architecture codename | Knights Mill (2017) | K7 (2000−2003) |
| Release date | 1 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 5 September 2000 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 272 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 0.75 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 200 MT/s |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 25 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 33.4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750.
| PCI Express lanes | 36 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2017 | 5 September 2000 |
| Physical cores | 68 | 1 |
| Threads | 272 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 33 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7285 has an age advantage of 17 years, 6700% more physical cores and 27100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 750, on the other hand, has 657.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7285 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7285 and Duron 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
