Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon Phi 7250
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 269 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 20.86 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.55 |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 272 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 3647 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 68 | 12 |
| Threads | 272 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7250 has 466.7% more physical cores and 1033.3% more threads.
Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 72% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7250 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7250 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
