Ryzen 5 7640U vs Xeon Phi 31S1P
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 550 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 84.32 |
| Architecture codename | Knights Corner (2012−2014) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 17 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 228 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 350 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PCIe x16 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 June 2013 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 57 | 6 |
| Threads | 228 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon Phi 31S1P has 850% more physical cores and 1800% more threads.
Ryzen 5 7640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 31S1P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 31S1P and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
