Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon Max 9480

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Max 9480
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
53.24
+508%
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
8.76

Xeon Max 9480 outperforms Core Ultra 7 268V by a whopping 508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency14.4048.77
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids HBM (2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$12,980no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache112.5 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket4677Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes804

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Max 9480 53.24
+508%
Ultra 7 268V 8.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Max 9480 84567
+508%
Ultra 7 268V 13916

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.24 8.76
Recency 10 January 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 56 8
Threads 112 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon Max 9480 has a 507.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1958.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Max 9480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 268V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Max 9480 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Max 9480 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Max 9480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Max 9480 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.