Ryzen Threadripper 1998 vs Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Paxville (2002−2005) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | December 2005 (18 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 604 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 0 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper 1998 has 700% more physical cores, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1998 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1998, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
