Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1495 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.79 |
| Architecture codename | Paxville (2002−2005) | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) |
| Release date | December 2005 (18 years ago) | 8 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 209.78 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 200 million | 4950 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 604 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
