Athlon Gold 7220C vs Xeon MP 3.66
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Cranford (2005) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.67 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 6 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon Gold 7220C has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon MP 3.66 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.66 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
