Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Xeon MP 3.50
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.57 |
| Architecture codename | Cranford (2005) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 39 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 15940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 604 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon MP 3.50 has 107.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.50 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
