Ryzen 9 5900H vs Xeon MP 3.16

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated582
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiencyno data27.22
Architecture codenamePotomac (2005)Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)7 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.17 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache16 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB16 MB
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Number of transistors286 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket604FP6
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900H has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 3.16 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.16 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 3.16
Xeon MP 3.16
AMD Ryzen 9 5900H
Ryzen 9 5900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon MP 3.16 or Ryzen 9 5900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.