i7-11700F vs Xeon L7555
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 560 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | no data | 19.25 |
Architecture codename | no data | Rocket Lake (2021) |
Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 24 MB L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1567 | FCLGA1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2010 | 16 March 2021 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-11700F has an age advantage of 11 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L7555 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L7555 and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.