E1-1200 vs Xeon L5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5640 and E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1646not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.62no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5640 and E1-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size239 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5640 and E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FT1
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5640 and E1-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5640 and E1-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5640 and E1-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5640 and E1-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5640 and E1-1200.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5640 4645
+1122%
E1-1200 380

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon L5640 398
+323%
E1-1200 94

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon L5640 1934
+1087%
E1-1200 163

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 6 June 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon L5640 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E1-1200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon L5640 and E1-1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon L5640 is a server/workstation processor while E1-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5640 and E1-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5640
Xeon L5640
AMD E1-1200
E1-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Xeon L5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 274 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5640 or E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.