Celeron 1017U vs Xeon L5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5640
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.92
+207%
Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95

Xeon L5640 outperforms Celeron 1017U by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16592516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.70no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.615.29
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size239 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5640 2.92
+207%
Celeron 1017U 0.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5640 4645
+208%
Celeron 1017U 1508

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon L5640 398
+51.3%
Celeron 1017U 263

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon L5640 1934
+326%
Celeron 1017U 454

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.92 0.95
Recency 16 March 2010 1 July 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon L5640 has a 207.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 252.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1017U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5640 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1017U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5640 and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5640
Xeon L5640
Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 59 votes

Rate Xeon L5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5640 or Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.