3015e vs Xeon L5638

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5638
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.38
+36.8%

Xeon L5638 outperforms 3015e by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5638 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17882039
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency3.6826.93
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5638 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5638 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FT5
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5638 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5638 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5638 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5638 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5638 and 3015e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5638 2.38
+36.8%
3015e 1.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5638 3707
+36.7%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 1.74
Recency 16 March 2010 4 August 2020
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon L5638 has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5638 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5638 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5638 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5638
Xeon L5638
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon L5638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5638 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.