Atom C3508 vs Xeon L5618

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data9.48
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.87 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature87 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 15 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 11 Watt

Xeon L5618 has 100% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 263.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5618 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5618
Xeon L5618
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5618 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5618 or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.