EPYC 9654 vs Xeon L5420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5420
2008
50 Watt
1.35
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+5510%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon L5420 by a whopping 5510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.5619.91
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data96
Threadsno data192
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5420 1.35
EPYC 9654 75.73
+5510%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5420 2143
EPYC 9654 120295
+5513%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon L5420 332
EPYC 9654 1837
+453%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon L5420 917
EPYC 9654 18836
+1954%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 75.73
Recency 1 January 2008 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon L5420 has 620% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 5509.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5420 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5420 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5420
Xeon L5420
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 149 votes

Rate Xeon L5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 993 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5420 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.