EPYC 9135 vs Xeon L5410

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
50 Watt
1.22
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+2897%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Xeon L5410 by a whopping 2897% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking233496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.25
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.3017.21
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5410 1.22
EPYC 9135 36.56
+2897%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1940
EPYC 9135 58070
+2893%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 36.56
Recency 1 January 2008 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon L5410 has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 2896.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5410 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 67 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5410 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.