Xeon 5130 vs L5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
+118%
Xeon 5130
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50

Xeon L5335 outperforms Xeon 5130 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24022878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.110.74
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.060.73
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380$16

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5130 has 573% better value for money than Xeon L5335.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache4 MB (per die)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data65 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25VB2=1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA771771
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-+

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
+118%
Xeon 5130 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
+118%
Xeon 5130 795

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 0.50
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon L5335 has a 118% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and Xeon 5130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or Xeon 5130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.