Xeon E-2478 vs Gold 6416H

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
25.56
+36.1%
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Xeon E-2478 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.4382.64
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency14.6622.22
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,444$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2478 has 67% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6416H.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version55
PCI Express lanes8016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6416H 25.56
+36.1%
Xeon E-2478 18.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+36.1%
Xeon E-2478 29827

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.56 18.78
Recency 10 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon Gold 6416H has a 36.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 106.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6416H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2478 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6416H and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6416H or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.