Processor N200 vs Xeon Gold 6354
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6354 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 172 | 2085 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 36 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 39 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 77 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4189 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Status | Launched | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.80 | 1.57 |
| Recency | 6 April 2021 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 4 |
| Threads | 36 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6354 has a 1607% higher aggregate performance score, and 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 3316.7% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Gold 6354 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 6354 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6354 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
