Pentium 1407 vs Xeon Gold 6330N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 226 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 13.13 | no data |
Release date | 1 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 April 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 56 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | no data | 0 GT/s |
L3 cache | 42 MB | 5 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 86 °C | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.6V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA4189 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AVX |
AES-NI | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 |
Maximum memory size | 6 TB | 375 GB |
Max memory channels | 8 | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 64 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 April 2021 | 1 April 2012 |
Physical cores | 28 | 2 |
Threads | 56 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 80 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6330N has an age advantage of 9 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 1407, on the other hand, has 106.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6330N and Pentium 1407, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.