Xeon w7-3455 vs Gold 6258R

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6258R
2020
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.34
Xeon w7-3455
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 270 Watt
36.76
+45.1%

Xeon w7-3455 outperforms Xeon Gold 6258R by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.8141.68
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.7012.88
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,950$2,489

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-3455 has 202% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6258R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data24
Threads5648
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB67.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6258R 25.34
Xeon w7-3455 36.76
+45.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6258R 40252
Xeon w7-3455 58393
+45.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.34 36.76
Recency 24 February 2020 15 February 2023
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 48
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon Gold 6258R has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads, and 31.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3455, on the other hand, has a 45.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Xeon w7-3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6258R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon w7-3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R
Intel Xeon w7-3455
Xeon w7-3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6258R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6258R or Xeon w7-3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.