Xeon Platinum 8461V vs Gold 6258R

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6258R
2020
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.34
Xeon Platinum 8461V
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
47.20
+86.3%

Xeon Platinum 8461V outperforms Xeon Gold 6258R by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.0224.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.7014.89
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,950$4,491

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8461V has 72% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6258R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads5696
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6258R 25.34
Xeon Platinum 8461V 47.20
+86.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6258R 40252
Xeon Platinum 8461V 74982
+86.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.34 47.20
Recency 24 February 2020 10 January 2023
Physical cores 28 48
Threads 56 96
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon Gold 6258R has 46.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8461V, on the other hand, has a 86.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6258R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Platinum 8461V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R
Intel Xeon Platinum 8461V
Xeon Platinum 8461V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6258R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8461V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6258R or Xeon Platinum 8461V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.