EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Gold 6242
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Gold 6242 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 360 | 115 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.43 | 20.60 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Milan (2021) |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,529 | $1,825 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7413 has 177% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6242.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 22 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | no data | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | Socket P | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | 204.795 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Gold 6242 by 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Gold 6242 by 91% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.00 | 32.47 |
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 12 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 180 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6242 has 20% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 91% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6242 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6242 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
