3015e vs Xeon Gold 6209U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6209U
2019
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
16.62
+839%

Xeon Gold 6209U outperforms 3015e by a whopping 839% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4142036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency12.1226.90
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads404
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.25 MB192 KB
L2 cache20 MB1 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FT5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6209U 16.62
+839%
3015e 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6209U 25430
+838%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.62 1.77
Recency 2 April 2019 4 August 2020
Physical cores 20 2
Threads 40 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon Gold 6209U has a 839% higher aggregate performance score, and 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6209U is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6209U is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6209U and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6209U
Xeon Gold 6209U
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6209U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6209U or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.