Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Xeon Gold 6146

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6146
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
14.72
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.17
+3.1%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U outperforms Xeon Gold 6146 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking484461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency8.4151.06
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP7
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6146 14.72
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 15.17
+3.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6146 23296
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 24001
+3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.72 15.17
Recency 11 July 2017 16 April 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon Gold 6146 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, on the other hand, has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 489.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6146
Xeon Gold 6146
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 18 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6146 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.