Ryzen 5 8500G vs Xeon Gold 6146

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6146
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
15.06
+7.3%

Xeon Gold 6146 outperforms Ryzen 5 8500G by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking469526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.82no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4814

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6146 15.06
+7.3%
Ryzen 5 8500G 14.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6146 23296
+7.4%
Ryzen 5 8500G 21694

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.06 14.03
Recency 11 July 2017 8 January 2024
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6146 has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8500G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6146 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6146 and Ryzen 5 8500G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6146
Xeon Gold 6146
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
Ryzen 5 8500G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 166 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6146 or Ryzen 5 8500G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.