Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Gold 6144

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6144
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
12.59
+175%
Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.58

Xeon Gold 6144 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6161306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.102.32
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency7.945.42
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,925$370

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6144 has 34% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6144 12.59
+175%
Xeon E3-1270 v3 4.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6144 19993
+175%
Xeon E3-1270 v3 7270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.59 4.58
Recency 11 July 2017 2 June 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon Gold 6144 has a 174.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3-1270 v3, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6144 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1270 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6144 and Xeon E3-1270 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6144
Xeon Gold 6144
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Xeon E3-1270 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6144 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1295 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6144 or Xeon E3-1270 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.