Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Xeon Gold 6144

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking601not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency7.94no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,925no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache24.75 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6144 19993
+3058%
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2017 1 February 2010
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 6144 has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6144 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6144 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6144
Xeon Gold 6144
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6144 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6144 or Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.