Xeon Platinum 8174 vs Gold 6143

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking436not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.20no data
Release date1 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L3 cache22 MB33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature74 °C65 °C
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels66
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon Gold 6143 has 17.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8174, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6143 and Xeon Platinum 8174, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6143
Xeon Gold 6143
Intel Xeon Platinum 8174
Xeon Platinum 8174

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6143 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8174 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6143 or Xeon Platinum 8174, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.